How is television influencing public communication and how important is it today? Is it still a dead medium? Young people in particular now prefer the internet in almost all areas of their lives that are relevant to them. While you 먹튀신ㄱ let’s go through it.
Pictures in the head
The sequence of numbers “9-11” causes the same reaction among the vast majority of people: they see certain pictures in front of them. You see an airplane drilling into a skyscraper, and then a fireball emerges. And when it comes to the phrase fall of the wall, most people remember images in which columns drive through a trellis of applauding people or on which people jostle each other on the Berlin Wall. When landing on the moon, most of the older people think about how they watched the first moon landing on television in 1969 at night. Many of them remember the snippet in slow motion from the broadcast of the 1966 FIFA World Cup final on the tag “Wembley Gate.” They also remember how bitterly it was debated.
All of these pictures were originally on television. Television shapes the images in your head, not just the still images, but also the moving sequences of images that take place in our mind’s eye. We remember both the astronaut’s first footprint in moon dust and the jerky images of his first steps on the moon.
Picture icon
Originally from the Greek, an icon is actually a special form of ecclesiastical cult or holy images. In colloquial usage, however, an icon is understood to be a person or thing that represents a certain time or an attitude towards lifestyle icon. On the other hand, Bild-Icon emphasizes the condensation of a sense of time or life or a special historical moment in an image created by modern technical processes analog and digital photography, television, or film recording. Such iconic icons stand out from the flood of everyday images and become representative of the time or event in the collective memory.
Is television still the leading medium of public communication?
Our collective memory is shaped by television images by events that have been burned by television. Television thus forms our shared memory as well as our experience of the present and our view into the future. It can even be said that it shapes our worldview as a whole: what we share with many others is taken from television. Our ideas of politics, economics, culture, sport and the world of life are determined by television, just as the ideas of the radio and the press of the previous generation was.
But is not the age of television coming to an end? Do the original TV pictures have the weight they had ten years ago? Is not television now being overtaken by the Internet, just as television has replaced radio as the leading medium, and radio, in turn, has replaced the press? Our key question is: is television still the leading medium of public communication?
This question sounds even without the “still” skeptical. It is already part of the answer that this question is asked in the first place: The position of television in public communication is no longer self-evident, as once the photo reports of the magazine Stern or the sports broadcasts in radio no longer taken for granted the public experience have shaped.